Gigi Hadid and Zayn Malik Are Part of a New Generation Who Don’t See Fashion as Gendered
Midway through Virginia Woolf’s novel Orlando,
a startling transformation takes place: Our hero, Duke Orlando, awakens
from a seven-day slumber to find that he has switched genders. “Orlando
had become a woman,” Woolf writes, “but in every other respect, Orlando
remained precisely as he had been. The change of sex, though it altered
their future, did nothing whatever to alter their identity.”
This gender-bending approach to fashion has begun to achieve critical mass in pop culture and on the catwalk, with Alessandro Michele dressing his Gucci girls in dandyish suits and his Gucci boys in floral and brocade, actress Evan Rachel Wood wearing Altuzarra tuxedos on the red carpet, Pharrell Williams gallivanting down the Chanel runway in a tweed blazer and long strings of pearls, and rapper Young Thug posing on the cover of his mixtape in a long ruffled dress. More broadly, designers such as Miuccia Prada and Raf Simons at Calvin Klein are knitting their men’s and women’s collections together, showing them on the same catwalk and twinning certain looks—identical fabrics, identical embellishments, nearly identical silhouettes.
Jonathan Anderson, meanwhile, sees his blurring of gender lines in aesthetic terms. When he included dresses in his fall 2013 J.W.Anderson menswear collection, the aim, he says, was “to play with new moods and silhouettes; to find newness.” Hence his surprise when the U.K. tabloids responded with wrath. “Men in dresses! Shock! Horror!” Anderson says, laughing. “I’m not sure the world was ready for what we were doing.” But he stuck to his guns—and now there’s a whole wave of British menswear designers challenging traditional notions of masculinity, including Martine Rose, who claims fans such as A$AP Rocky and Rihanna, and Grace Wales Bonner, winner of the 2016 LVMH Prize for Young Fashion Designers.
Thanks for reading^^
-GIO-
source : www.vogue.com
He becomes they.
The pronouns shift, but the person remains the same. Woolf’s words,
written in 1928, could easily be mistaken for a manifesto posted
yesterday on Tumblr, the preferred platform for the growing cohort of
“fluid” young people who, like Orlando, breezily crisscross the XX/XY
divide. Fashion, of course, has taken note of the movement, which is
sufficiently evolved to boast its own pinups, including Jaden Smith, recently the star of a Louis Vuitton womenswear campaign, and androgynous Chinese pop star (and Riccardo Tisci
muse) Chris Lee. But where, exactly, is someone neither entirely he nor
she meant to shop? And how, exactly, is such a person to be defined?
“They don’t want to be defined,” says Olivier Rousteing,
creative director of Balmain, one of the many designers taking
inspiration from the trend. “You see boys wearing makeup, girls buying
menswear—they are not afraid to be who they are. This category or that
category—who cares? They want to define themselves.”This gender-bending approach to fashion has begun to achieve critical mass in pop culture and on the catwalk, with Alessandro Michele dressing his Gucci girls in dandyish suits and his Gucci boys in floral and brocade, actress Evan Rachel Wood wearing Altuzarra tuxedos on the red carpet, Pharrell Williams gallivanting down the Chanel runway in a tweed blazer and long strings of pearls, and rapper Young Thug posing on the cover of his mixtape in a long ruffled dress. More broadly, designers such as Miuccia Prada and Raf Simons at Calvin Klein are knitting their men’s and women’s collections together, showing them on the same catwalk and twinning certain looks—identical fabrics, identical embellishments, nearly identical silhouettes.
This
new blasé attitude toward gender codes marks a radical break. Consider
the scene one recent morning out in Montauk, New York, where the photos
accompanying this story were shot: Gigi Hadid and Zayn Malik
snuggle in interchangeable tracksuits as, nearby, Hadid’s younger
brother, Anwar, rocks back and forth on a tire swing, his sheer lace top
exposing scattered tattoos. For these millennials, at least,
descriptives like boy or girl rank pretty low on the list of important qualities—and the way they dress reflects that.
“I
shop in your closet all the time, don’t I?” Hadid, 22, flicks a lock of
dyed-green hair out of her boyfriend’s eyes as she poses the question.
“Yeah, but same,” replies Malik, 24. “What was that T-shirt I borrowed the other day?”
“The Anna Sui?” asks Hadid.
“Yeah,” Malik says. “I like that shirt. And if it’s tight on me, so what? It doesn’t matter if it was made for a girl.”
Hadid
nods vigorously. “Totally. It’s not about gender. It’s about, like,
shapes. And what feels good on you that day. And anyway, it’s fun to
experiment. . . .”
Anwar, eavesdropping, pipes
up. “We’re chill!” he calls out from a picnic table not far away.
“People our age, we’re just chill. You can be whoever you want,” he
adds, ambling over, “as long as you’re being yourself.”
This
is how you can tell a paradigm shift has taken place: when a fresh way
of seeing a thing seems like common sense. Once, the Earth was flat;
then it was round—at which point, of course it was. Likewise, for
eighteen-year-old Anwar Hadid
and many of his peers, gender is a more or less arbitrary distinction, a
boundary that can be traversed at will. Maybe that leads you to call
yourself agender or bigender or demiboy or mostly girl—or maybe it just
means that you and your significant other share a wardrobe. Either way,
there’s a terrific opportunity for play.
It’s this space that fashion designers have rushed into. Alessandro Michele, whose recent Gucci shows
have been at the epicenter of fashion’s genderquake, says that he
treats traditional feminine and masculine wardrobe codes “as if they
were a language, a score, a dictionary.
“I use
them to rewrite a story,” Michele explains. “I find it fascinating to
break and mystify them in order to reinvent them in a different way. I
create space for a personal interpretation.”Jonathan Anderson, meanwhile, sees his blurring of gender lines in aesthetic terms. When he included dresses in his fall 2013 J.W.Anderson menswear collection, the aim, he says, was “to play with new moods and silhouettes; to find newness.” Hence his surprise when the U.K. tabloids responded with wrath. “Men in dresses! Shock! Horror!” Anderson says, laughing. “I’m not sure the world was ready for what we were doing.” But he stuck to his guns—and now there’s a whole wave of British menswear designers challenging traditional notions of masculinity, including Martine Rose, who claims fans such as A$AP Rocky and Rihanna, and Grace Wales Bonner, winner of the 2016 LVMH Prize for Young Fashion Designers.
“I’m playing with elements that might be considered feminine, but always in pursuit of an ideal of male beauty,” Wales Bonner says. “Are there versions of male beauty that incorporate flamboyance and vulnerability?”
Of course there are: Think Prince and David Bowie,
both of whom scrambled male and female fashion codes in the name of
liberation. For more current examples, think of James Charles, the
eighteen-year-old makeup fanatic tapped last year as CoverGirl’s
first-ever male campaign star—or the gender-blurring members of the art
collective House of Ladosha featured in the upcoming New Museum
exhibition “Trigger: Gender as a Tool and a Weapon.” Or check out the
Instagram belonging to New York City man-about-town Richie Shazam.
“Fashion
allows me to break the rules,” says Shazam, 27, who has earned a
fervent following for his distinctive his/hers look. “I adorn and
embellish myself, play with makeup and jewelry, and just put on clothes
that are beautiful. Through fashion, I get to explore my own ideas about
what’s manly.”
Women, of course, have been
permitted to explore different iterations of femininity for some
time—men are merely playing catch-up. But there is something new in the
way women now buck social mores: Conventional notions of “sexiness” are
being refused point-blank. When model and actor Ruby Rose uploaded “Break Free” in 2014, the video—which
shows Rose transforming from a made-up, minidress-clad, long-locked
Barbie into a cropped-cut and tattooed androgyne—went viral, with 28
million viewers and counting. Suddenly the notion that a person could
dwell in a state of sexual flux was a trending topic.
“When
I came out, I came out as trans,” says Tyler Ford, the agender poet and
activist who first found fame as Miley Cyrus’s date to the amfAR gala
in 2015. “I felt like you had to choose—that there were only two boxes
you could tick, and if I had to pick one, maybe boy felt more right. But it never felt entirely right. Then I read about being non-binary online, and it was, like, Aahhhh. . . .
“I’m
a college dropout,” Ford continues. “I’ve never taken a queer-theory
course. But the ideas are trickling down via the Internet, and they make
intuitive sense to me. I am who I am, and I just want to exist as
myself.”
I just want to exist as myself. This is a generation’s cri de coeur,
and if technology has enabled its elevation as a rallying cry,
technology also accounts for the intensity of millennials’ drive to
resist categorization. Social-media natives, they’ve been trained from
childhood to maintain profiles on Instagram or Facebook that can reduce a
person to a list of biographical data or a face among faces competing
for “likes”—or function as platforms to transmit a complex, sui generis
identity.
“I have a friend who identifies as ‘all boy, all girl, all male, all female,’” says Gypsy Sport designer Rio Uribe, who is known for his party-like fashion shows
cast with pals from all along the gender spectrum. “It’s like—what is
that? But it doesn’t matter what it is.” Eluding the labels,
constructing an identity apart—for Uribe, that’s “a clapback to a
society that wants to define you.”
For a
demographic so keenly attuned to being looked at, style serves as a
convenient means of liberation. And so it’s always been, as Marc Jacobs points out.
“These
kids—I’m not sure they’re any different from the people I saw at
Danceteria or Mudd Club in the eighties,” Jacobs says. “The difference
is that back then, the expression—extreme looks, cross-dressing, what
have you—was hidden away in a speakeasy or a club. Today, thanks to the
Internet, that culture is widely exposed.”
Young New York–based brands such as Gypsy Sport, Eckhaus Latta, Vaquera, and Chromat
are doing the same thing—striking out from the safe space of the club
to bring their anything-goes ethos to the runway and the street.
Millennials
like Gigi Hadid have taken this new freedom to heart. “One day you can
be this,” she says, watching as Malik is buttoned into a bedazzled Gucci
blazer, “and another day you can do that.”
Over
the course of a few short years, that craving for latitude has
manifested a trend that’s electrified fashion, transforming not only the
look of clothes but the ways they are presented and sold. Chances are,
there’s no going back—though a man in a dress or a woman who doesn’t
shave her legs and prefers not to be called “she” is still an affront in
many places. But if this month’s cover stars are anything to go by, the
momentum is all in the direction of attitude, not gender, as the
all-important marker of a human being.
“If
Zayn’s wearing a tight shirt and tight jeans and a big, drapey coat,”
Hadid says, “I mean—I’d wear that, too. It’s just about, Do the clothes
feel right on you?”
Malik shoots Hadid a tender look and joins the conversation.
“With
social media, the world’s gotten very small,” he says, “and it can seem
like everyone’s doing the same thing. Gender, whatever—you want to make
your own statement. You know? You want to feel distinct.”Thanks for reading^^
-GIO-
source : www.vogue.com
Komentar
Posting Komentar